a famous israeli politician announced who he thinks
did the most harm to jews? s
my guess would be people who killed many jews from the numerous loss in the nazi to large yet relatively smaller massacres seems like most harm to me...
but that is not the opinion of the israeli "head of science" knesset member mk maklev. the issue important to the israeli government head of "science' is his opinion about "harmful" reform jews.
mk maklev describes himself as balanced he condemns the bad ultra-orthodox called "peleg yerushalmi" while also criticizing israeli supreme court "i have no trust in israeli supreme court" he wears a black kipa to display his faith.
he claims that the reforms did "the greatest damage to the jews". published november 6, last month in israel hayom hebrew page 25.
if any science is influenced by such a person we are in a sinking boat.
his opinion is not only annoying to me, but also refutably stupid because he claims "the reform married intermarriage of million of jews and their children are not jews" this is his expulsion of jews... he like other orthodox rabbis, is the one kicking them out. according to reform which is supported by jacob and isac they can be considered jews. who was jacobs wife? did jacob marry the daughter of abraham? of course not.
it is those orthodox that divide the nation and kick out jews they are the ones doing precisely "that harm of less jews" by expelling those jews-by-family.
also when we consider numbers... no jewish child "leaves" jewish because of intermariage as i will explain. firstly those who love a pretty girl will marry her with or without reform the difference is they can remain connected to jewish by marrying "jewish -reform ceremony"and when we consider the children...
if the mother is jewish marrying an american... is there any doubt the kid is jewish? how dare maklev kick-out=expel=exclude jews and say they are not jewish.
if mom is not jewish then there are 2 possibilities one the kid is jewish like jacobs sons... or even in his assumption it is not a loss because "there is no jew going out" if the child is born not a jew as he assumes... no change results from the marriage zero changeno jew is changed either way EXCEPT for his own words maklev is the one making "less" jews. by excluding reform and intermarried children. adn influencing the government to exclude reform jews and intermarried children.
did you know? in america there are around 8 million "jews by family' and a quarter of them OVER 2 million responded in the year 2000 census "my parents are jewish but not me". when we see how the orthodox jews accuse the reform in general and accuse them of "worst damage" no wonder so many want to flee from orthodox jews who talk that way.
as if the orthodox did not change? e
the talmud itself is "reform with many changes" relative to the original rabbis too, those generations.
the concept "mishna rishona mishna ahrona" demonstrates several orthodox lies one that "reform is bad because they change from tradition" that is precisely what happens in "mishna ahrona". if change is defined as bad [as orthodox students are taught to believe] then the mishna is bad allowing change and no foundation for orthodox halaka nor life style it is all bad by their own dstandards. a=b=c.
if mishna as they claim is "from god oral law" as they lie to kids it would be rebelion against god to have "mishna ahrona" changing from god the lie is revealed mishna is not from god even by their own standards. that is why they do not obey mishna many actions showing with actions it is not from god.
worse is the changes in the talmud.
talmud yoma preserved the tradition of the 'original rabbinic" jews "not say the blessing "zman" shehechiyanu on yom kipur... if so it is a "rabbinic sin to say a blessing" or even a biblical sin to say it because it is a "blessing in vain" which the rabbis specified not to say... that is not "holier" but specified as bad by orthodox standards and then the later rabbis inside talmud violate both the specific tradition of "rab and samuel' not to say it and change also violating the rule of "sin to say blessing not required" and the talmud itself is reform.
if as orthodox students are taught change is bad then that applies equally to the encouragement of this sin in the talmud itself... the talmud itself is "bad by orthodox standards" changing and causing sins by its own standards it is not a book to study in yeshiva by orthodox... that is a reason not to study the talmud if reform is bad as you say this book is the same sin.
unless change is good, if so stop accusing the reform of "greatest damage" and since they dont stop but do say such accusations, the lie is revealed but revealed as lying in a way that rips apart the nation.
as above even on the issue of intermarriage results, is truly zero change because if mom is jewish then intermarriage has no change the children are jewish the same as if both parents and if the father only is jewish then that is like jacobs sons.
;){kind=link}