bible from god?
we commonly see one volume published containing many bible books together however if we would know that some versins dont match we woud not include BOTH versions in the same volume.
even if we accept jeremia and daniel as prophets we must not dirty them with the filth of other books in the same volume.
in fact if god told one author one version then the other version is not from god and since neither author knew which was truth and include both we can be certain that the books are separate from god who knew which version was true or a third version !! ergo books not holy.
first samuel has a different version of saul death than 2 samuel and the SPLIT of book samuel serves the purpose of hiding the two versions kuz if end "a book" wont read following chapter same day. separate book despite both samuel only split to hide and to deceive,
similarly book of kings and cron different version of zedekia as researchers pointed out so neither from god.
we can compare by asking who was the king before danial
how would we know who was the jewish king before daniel?
we must NOT accept any book before checking. to save you time, i checkd and found that researchers have trouble reconciling.
only jospehus preserved the idea that jews believed. so did he select the true version? lets check.
the hebrew version has comments that note the flaw, the traditional versions differ not matching in the jew religious books, not only internal flaw contradiction indicating books separate from god who knew, challenging both versions, but also external we know years of nebkdnzr and mesa revealing book wrong year numbers so not reliable source.
one comment claimd both versions "intend zedekia was uncle" but the other comment claims both sources "intend zdk was brother" so trouble. both books bad whichever was true, god did not reveal to the authors so both books not holy and a book that contains both versions is not holy.
we study nebukadnezer from josephus: book TEN chapter 6 around year 590 bc til 530 bc
nbk king babln attakd land by damascus battling neco king of egypt who ruled there ne' from juda. nb' won. next nb' surrounded jrs so king jkm paid money. when stopd paying, nb' attakd and killd jkm. nb appointed "son jcn" son of joakim to manage under himself. soon nb' replaced jcn with zdk
how related?
we must NOT accept the "recomendation" of bible before inspection !
inspect how? i save you time: 2 kings 24,17 zdk was uncle "mtn dodo," of jcn, differs from 2 cron 36,10 brother of jcn as researchers point out, admitting flaw. one comment claims uncle true if so brother false kuz bro of joakim. other comment claims zdk brother true if so uncle false. the flaw is not simply the book is unreliable... we must see BIG picture.
God knows if zdk was bro or uncle, and books not from god not holy kuz separate from god who knew.
religion flaw. jews believed as preserved in josephus zdk jcn's UNCLE, but not "quoting" either book kuz differs wording.
7, nb exiled jcn to bbln. nb chose zdk king under his rule. z allied with egypt who came to fyt nb but nb won. "appointed jcn's UNCLE zdk as king. zdk vowd loyalty under nb". but zdk allied with egypt who lost.
jsps not copy from bad bible, bible said "uncle mat" or "brother" but jew believed uncle zed differs this detail not rely on bad book.,
8 nb' conqrd jrslm, n burnt temple . exiled jews to bbln.
in war jsps wrote date of this burn "burnt second on tenth of month same date as first temple" matching the day god chose in book jeremia which rabbis defeat god.
9, bbl set gdl'to govern remaining jews in judea. a man kild gdl'. then jews disobeyed jrm by going to egypt. nb conqrd egypt took those jews captive n exiled to bbln. 10, daniel exled to bbln
dn was from zdk family, dn told king his dream n its meaning. 11, persia conqrd bbln n led dn to media. dn told prophecys. next is about cyrus in following book.
;){kind=link}